Aristotle believed that happiness can allow people to live the ‘good life’. This essay will be examining the ethics of Plato ( BCE) and Aristotle ( BCE) to analyse, justify and compare the major concepts of the two philosophers therein. I will argue that Aristotle’s solution to Aug 14, · The candidate identifies that Plato favoured reason while Aristotle argued from experience. The candidate has also shown what the line of reasoning will be in this essay: the Platonic thesis. The essay should therefore argue towards that rationalist perspective and conclude likewise. Plato’s main theory is that of the World of blogger.comted Reading Time: 10 mins Plato And Aristotle Disagree About Virtue. Plato And Aristotle Words | 6 Pages. Plato and Aristotle Disagree about Virtue Plato and Aristotle are great philosophers and they have talked a lot about virtue. Although these two people started from similar settings, their ideas about virtue were actually different. Plato’s philosophy was more about non-material things, like ideas and love
Plato and Aristotle Comparison - Words | Critical Writing Example
However it is good to practise questions which contain extra technical vocabulary to get you used to using this vocabulary. For further essays go to our Model Essays book available int he shop aristotle and plato essays all answers heavily marked by our experts to justify the grade given. Plato, a Greek philosopher, believed that episteme, true knowledge, came from reason. He believed doxa came from experiencing the world, which he believed in aristotle and plato essays gave humans the true knowledge they seek.
His student, Aristotle believed doxa was the first step in gaining true knowledge as it existed in the physical world. This is an excellent introduction showing the different points of view on the question about the origin of knowledge. The candidate identifies that Plato favoured reason while Aristotle argued from experience.
The candidate has also shown what the line of reasoning will be in aristotle and plato essays essay: the Platonic thesis. The essay should therefore argue towards that rationalist perspective and conclude likewise. Plato states that the World of FORMs is recognisable by humans as our souls transmigrated.
Before reincarnating, our souls were able to recognise the true FORMs before we forgot them in our earthly bodies, aristotle and plato essays. Plato describes the World of FORMs as unchangeable.
Plato states we can experience the examples of the FORMs in our earthly bodies. Those who do not understand the FORMs however will say there are different types of tree. Plato condemns this type of thinking and says we in fact recognise the examples of the perfect FORM of tree-ness. In the allegory of the cave, the free prisoner symbolises the attainment of true knowledge by recognising the true FORMs when escaping the cave.
The shadows watched by the other prisoners is not the true reality, however they believe this is true reality as this is what they experienced. Therefore, episteme comes from reason. Given the time constraints of an essay, only 40 minutes, it is impossible to detail everything, so the candidate must sacrifice great depth to cover all points. Here the candidate has shown an understanding of the FORMs, the cave and influences on Plato. The candidate then links back to the question by showing that this approach shows that episteme comes from reason.
Aristotle challenges his teacher further by stating that the World of FORMs cannot be proved as it relies on reincarnation. The World of FORMs is not in the temporal world meaning there is no empirical proof of it, aristotle and plato essays. The candidate has attempted to undermine Plato by presenting the Third Man Fallacy which has been done fairly well, though some additional explanation would be better. The challenge from the evidence for reincarnation could be better emphasised.
This reductio ad absurdum is a good challenge to use against Plato. Aristotle questions if there are FORMs for everything such as a sick dog or a three-legged cat. Plato however is supported by Pythagoras. He also states that all things are static and unchanging, suggesting that the World of FORMs and the FORMs are perfect and eternal. This signifies that humans cannot experience the world the same way twice, indicating that true knowledge is aristotle and plato essays e. maths cannot come from experience.
From the support of philosophers and examples, aristotle and plato essays, episteme comes from reason. Aristotle emphasised the value of studying the physical world and this approach is empirical.
Aristotle believed that everything is related to having four causes. This aristotle and plato essays matter, form, their efficient cause and their final cause; telos. An example of this is a wax stamp the matter if the wax stamp is the stamp itself while the form is what it is made of. The actuality of the wax stamp is what actually, physically it is, and the potentiality is what it could become, in this case a seal for a letter.
This reason illustrates that all things have a purpose and the potentiality of it is effect. Therefore, episteme does in fact come from experience. The wax stamp is an excellent example to aristotle and plato essays. Another would be the bronze statue showing bronze matter, in the statue form, created by the sculptor with the purpose of honouring the gods, aristotle and plato essays.
The link back to the question might have been better emphasised: that we aristotle and plato essays the world through this empirical approach rather than from the armchair. He believed that they are unable to control themselves and should be enslaved which we would not accept as truthful.
This should be rounded up and a mid-conclusion should be drawn, then linked back to the question as the next part of the paragraph is on a different aspect of the response to Aristotle.
Democritus, a Greek philosopher believed that if a rock was continuously cut aristotle and plato essays to, a piece would be so tiny that it could no longer be divided.
He called this a-toms and believed they were eternal. A-toms in atoms however was a failure as atoms can be divided into protons, neutrons and electrons. This shows that experience just gives changing opinion and episteme comes from reason, further supported by the change in physics from Newtonian mechanics to Quantum physics.
This is an excellent challenge against Aristotle as it shows that reason established what empiricism never managed to achieve, an understanding of the theory of non-divisibles.
This conclusive point should be made clear and linked back to the question, aristotle and plato essays. The World of FORMs illustrates that everything we experience now is primarily not the true reality and only our souls can experience the World of FORMs.
The use of supporting scholars throughout have helped to draw that conclusion so it is unsurprising, though validly done, that this conclusion is drawn.
The candidate has shown a very good breadth and some good depth of knowledge. The use of additional scholars is an excellent way of showing a wider understanding of the topic and the context of the theories.
The candidate challenges Plato and then responds to the challenges very well. All challenges are resolved so that the conclusion is expected, but balanced. All arguments are developed well and justified with evidence and scholarly opinion which is excellent. The line of reasoning begins in the introduction and continues all the way through to the conclusion.
This is exactly what should appear in an essay. The thesis statement in the introduction should sign-post where the essay will go and it should all come to a final conclusion validly argued and demonstrated in what has been presented.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Home Digital Resources Blog Visit Peped. Model Essay Plato and Aristotle.
by peter. Study with us. Practise Questions Religious Studies Guides — Check out our great books in the Shop.
Aristotle and Plato: Life After Death – Compare and Contrast - Free Essay Sample
, time: 5:24Aristotle and Plato Essay - Words | Bartleby
Aug 14, · The candidate identifies that Plato favoured reason while Aristotle argued from experience. The candidate has also shown what the line of reasoning will be in this essay: the Platonic thesis. The essay should therefore argue towards that rationalist perspective and conclude likewise. Plato’s main theory is that of the World of blogger.comted Reading Time: 10 mins Plato And Aristotle Disagree About Virtue. Plato And Aristotle Words | 6 Pages. Plato and Aristotle Disagree about Virtue Plato and Aristotle are great philosophers and they have talked a lot about virtue. Although these two people started from similar settings, their ideas about virtue were actually different. Plato’s philosophy was more about non-material things, like ideas and love Aristotle believed that happiness can allow people to live the ‘good life’. This essay will be examining the ethics of Plato ( BCE) and Aristotle ( BCE) to analyse, justify and compare the major concepts of the two philosophers therein. I will argue that Aristotle’s solution to
No comments:
Post a Comment