Nature peer reviewed journal

Nature peer reviewed journal

 · Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process Jan Coping with peer rejection Oct Scientific publishing: Peer review, unmasked Mar Related external links. Kyle Cited by: 4  · Nature's peer-review process has remained unchanged for decades. But the journal is open to alternative approaches and, to that Peer Review | Nature

Journal Information | Nature

Thank you for visiting nature. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, nature peer reviewed journal, we recommend you use a more up to date browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer.

In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Scientists do not receive enough peer-review training, nature peer reviewed journal.

To improve this situation, a small group of editors and I developed a peer-review workflow to guide reviewers in delivering useful and thorough analyses that can really help authors to improve their papers. We suggest that you perform three readings of a paper, concentrating on a different element each time. At every point, remember to classify your comments as major or minor flaws.

Major flaws will need considerable time to explain or correct. The first reading is to get an overall impression of the paper and its aims. Take notes as you go. Make sure the paper is within the scope of the journal. Take particular note of the parts of the paper that your expertise speaks best to.

Be upfront and honest with the authors and the editor about which scientific aspects you will focus on in your review. This tells the authors how you — the nature peer reviewed journal — have interpreted the aims, results and novelty of their research. If they disagree with your analysis, they should, from your comments, be able to understand that this is not your fault, nature peer reviewed journal.

Your analysis is a clear message that the authors need to work on how they communicate their intentions.

You might also notice a fatal flaw during your first reading, nature peer reviewed journal. Forget minor or major flaws: a fatal flaw is one that stops the review process dead in its tracks.

Describe all flaws in your review, and submit it. Otherwise, simply reject. Remember, you still need time, peace and quiet. The second reading allows you to concentrate on the scientific nuts and bolts of the research: the method, nature peer reviewed journal, analysis and conclusions.

Remember to distinguish between major and minor issues, and to read the paper in chronological order. Ask the following questions:. Are the figures clear and fully described? It is particularly important to ensure that the questions put forth in the Introduction are answered properly in the Conclusions. Try to spot anywhere the paper might start to take you on a wild goose chase. During the third and final reading, you should concentrate on the writing and presentation.

The science might be great, but heavy composition and messy structure might bog down the main message. If you comment on the writing, make sure you back up your comments. Was the paper hard to read because the paragraphs did not flow together? Did the authors flood the paper with confusing acronyms? You do not need to copyedit a paper — that is generally the job of the journal that has asked you to review the article.

But any suggestions for improving the language more generally will be welcome, and nature peer reviewed journal are an important part of the peer-review process. You should nature peer reviewed journal have a list of comments and suggestions for a complete peer review. The full peer-review document can comprise the following sections:. Introduction: Mirror the article, state your expertise and whether the paper is publishable, or whether there are fatal flaws.

Now, read your review carefully, and preferably aloud: if you stumble when reciting your own text, then readers will probably do the same. Reading it this way will also draw your attention to how your criticisms might sound to the ears of nature peer reviewed journal authors. Ensure that your critiques are constructive nature peer reviewed journal not offensive.

Be helpful and not harmful. Sometimes, you should submit a harsh review, but never a rude one. McPeek, et al. View our full worksheet here. This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice.

Guest posts are encouraged. You can get in touch with the editor at naturecareerseditor nature. News 01 OCT News 25 AUG Career Column 19 AUG Technology Feature 04 OCT Spotlight 06 OCT Career Column 05 OCT Career Feature 04 OCT TUM CREATE Ltd. University Hospital of Muenster UKMWWU. Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation OMRF. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Advanced search. Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature. nature career column article. You have full access to this article via your institution, nature peer reviewed journal. Download PDF. University Hospital of Muenster UKMWWU Münster, Germany. Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation OMRF Oklahoma City, United States.

Close banner Close. Email address Sign up. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing. About the journal Journal Staff About the Editors Journal Information Our publishing models Editorial Values Statement Awards Journal Impact Contact Editorial policies History of Nature Send nature peer reviewed journal news tip.

Publish with us For Authors For Referees Submit manuscript. Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author, nature peer reviewed journal. Show results from All journals.

V. Todorovic - How to publish in Nature communications

, time: 1:00:34

Peer review — reviewed | Nature

 · Nature - Scientists receive too little peer-review training. Here’s one method for effectively peer-reviewing papers, says Mathew Stiller Cited by: 4 Peer Review | Nature  · Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process Jan Coping with peer rejection Oct Scientific publishing: Peer review, unmasked Mar Related external links. Kyle Cited by: 4